netdev - re: [PATCH ipsec-next 1/2] xfrm: introduce forwarding of ICMP Error messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:36:28 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, devel@...ux-ipsec.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: re: [PATCH ipsec-next 1/2] xfrm: introduce forwarding of ICMP Error
 messages


Hello Antony Antony,

The patch 63b21caba17e: "xfrm: introduce forwarding of ICMP Error
messages" from Jan 19, 2024 (linux-next), leads to the following
Smatch static checker warning:

	net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3708 __xfrm_policy_check()
	error: testing array offset 'dir' after use.

net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
  3689  
  3690          pol = NULL;
  3691          sk = sk_to_full_sk(sk);
  3692          if (sk && sk->sk_policy[dir]) {
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
If dir is XFRM_POLICY_FWD (2) then it is one element beyond the end of
the ->sk_policy[] array.

  3693                  pol = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, dir, &fl, family, if_id);
  3694                  if (IS_ERR(pol)) {
  3695                          XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINPOLERROR);
  3696                          return 0;
  3697                  }
  3698          }
  3699  
  3700          if (!pol)
  3701                  pol = xfrm_policy_lookup(net, &fl, family, dir, if_id);
  3702  
  3703          if (IS_ERR(pol)) {
  3704                  XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINPOLERROR);
  3705                  return 0;
  3706          }
  3707  
  3708          if (!pol && dir == XFRM_POLICY_FWD)
                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This assumes that dir can be 2.

  3709                  pol = xfrm_in_fwd_icmp(skb, &fl, family, if_id);
  3710  
  3711          if (!pol) {
  3712                  if (net->xfrm.policy_default[dir] == XFRM_USERPOLICY_BLOCK) {
  3713                          XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINNOPOLS);
  3714                          return 0;
  3715                  }
  3716  
  3717                  if (sp && secpath_has_nontransport(sp, 0, &xerr_idx)) {
  3718                          xfrm_secpath_reject(xerr_idx, skb, &fl);
  3719                          XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINNOPOLS);
  3720                          return 0;
  3721                  }
  3722                  return 1;

regards,
dan carpenter