[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee92b1d1-7520-b304-5aee-038b922720f2@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:38:08 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Alexei
Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper
Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang
<jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] remove page frag implementation in
vhost_net
On 2024/1/30 10:08, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 20:40:37 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> Is this patchset supposed to go through vhost tree instead of net-next?
>> As the state is changed to 'Not applicable' in the netdevbpf patchwork,
>> according to maintainer-netdev.rst:
>>
>> Not applicable patch is expected to be applied outside of the networking
>> subsystem
>
> Sorry about the confusion, DaveM changed the way he uses the states
> since they were documented. There were concurrent changes to the gve
> driver, patches no longer apply. Could you rebase?
Sure.
Thanks for clarifying.
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists