[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240130174041.74341188@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:40:41 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn
Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jie Luo
<quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq8074: add
clock-frequency to MDIO node
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 01:57:36 +0100 Christian Marangi wrote:
> > If we merge this via netdev, is a merge conflict likely? Any other
> > changes expected in this area, given the changes which might happen to
> > GCC soon, etc?
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>
> Honestly I don't expect much to change here in the mdio node.
>
> If it's a problem I can submit in a separate patch in linux-msm.
The arch maintainers usually prefer to take the DTS patches,
so if there isn't anything special here we should probably
default to that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists