[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef4a3a68-8415-41d3-81b7-b46976b61a82@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:18:15 +0000
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] dpll: check that pin is registered in
__dpll_pin_unregister()
On 06/02/2024 07:48, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
>
> Similar to what is done in dpll_device_unregister(), add assertion to
> __dpll_pin_unregister() to make sure driver does not try to unregister
> non-registered pin.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> index 61e5c607a72f..93c1bb7a6ef7 100644
> --- a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ static u32 dpll_pin_xa_id;
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, (d)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
> #define ASSERT_DPLL_NOT_REGISTERED(d) \
> WARN_ON_ONCE(xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, (d)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
> +#define ASSERT_DPLL_PIN_REGISTERED(p) \
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_get_mark(&dpll_pin_xa, (p)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>
> struct dpll_device_registration {
> struct list_head list;
> @@ -631,6 +633,7 @@ static void
> __dpll_pin_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
> const struct dpll_pin_ops *ops, void *priv)
> {
> + ASSERT_DPLL_PIN_REGISTERED(pin);
> dpll_xa_ref_pin_del(&dpll->pin_refs, pin, ops, priv);
> dpll_xa_ref_dpll_del(&pin->dpll_refs, dpll, ops, priv);
> if (xa_empty(&pin->dpll_refs))
Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists