netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fec: Always call fec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240213184427.5af2d7eb@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:44:27 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: John Ernberg <john.ernberg@...ia.se>
Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>, Clark
 Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Paolo
 Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fec: Always call fec_restart() in resume
 path

On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:50:30 +0000 John Ernberg wrote:
> Tested on 6.1 kernel and forward ported. I discovered this when we
> upgraded from 5.10 to 6.1, but the resume path in the FEC driver has had
> this imbalance since at least 2009.
> 
> This is also why I target the -next tree, I can't identify a proper commit
> to blame with a Fixes. Let me know if this should be the net tree anyway.

I thought you bisected it to one or two specific changes?
I'd put those down as Fixes tags and target net.