netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fec: Always call fec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5aba2c2b-b712-4827-acb2-d586508a3bd6@actia.se>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:27:02 +0000
From: John Ernberg <john.ernberg@...ia.se>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>, "Clark
 Wang" <xiaoning.wang@....com>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Paolo
 Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fec: Always call fec_restart() in resume
 path

On 2/14/24 03:44, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 10:50:30 +0000 John Ernberg wrote:
>> Tested on 6.1 kernel and forward ported. I discovered this when we
>> upgraded from 5.10 to 6.1, but the resume path in the FEC driver has had
>> this imbalance since at least 2009.
>>
>> This is also why I target the -next tree, I can't identify a proper commit
>> to blame with a Fixes. Let me know if this should be the net tree anyway.
> 
> I thought you bisected it to one or two specific changes?
> I'd put those down as Fixes tags and target net.

Hi Jakub,

You are correct, we thought so too at [1], but bisection is really hard 
because we need a whole bunch of patches on top to even boot the system 
(imx8qxp specific stuff in the NXP vendor tree that's difficult to 
rebase), we left it a bit open ended.

Over the course of the weekend I lost all confidence in my bisection 
after being confident for 4-5 days, because the more I thought about it 
the less it made sense for that commit to be the culprit.

I should probably have both followed up on that mail with that, and been 
clearer here. I apologize for failing that.

Best regards // John Ernberg

[1]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1f45bdbe-eab1-4e59-8f24-add177590d27@actia.se/