[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024021444-getaway-partly-e055@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 11:27:20 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kobject: reduce uevent_sock_mutex contention
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 08:48:27AM +0000, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> This series reduces the (small ?) contention over uevent_sock_mutex,
> noticed when creating/deleting many network namespaces/devices.
>
> 1) uevent_seqnum becomes an atomic64_t
>
> 2) Only acquire uevent_sock_mutex whenever using uevent_sock_list
Cool, any boot-time measured speedups from this? Or is this just tiny
optimizations that you noticed doing reviews?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists