[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240215023325.3309817-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:33:25 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Liang Li <liali@...hat.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 net] selftests: bonding: set active slave to primary eth1 specifically
In bond priority testing, we set the primary interface to eth1 and add
eth0,1,2 to bond in serial. This is OK in normal times. But when in
debug kernel, the bridge port that eth0,1,2 connected would start
slowly (enter blocking, forwarding state), which caused the primary
interface down for a while after enslaving and active slave changed.
Here is a test log from Jakub's debug test[1].
[ 400.399070][ T50] br0: port 1(s0) entered disabled state
[ 400.400168][ T50] br0: port 4(s2) entered disabled state
[ 400.941504][ T2791] bond0: (slave eth0): making interface the new active one
[ 400.942603][ T2791] bond0: (slave eth0): Enslaving as an active interface with an up link
[ 400.943633][ T2766] br0: port 1(s0) entered blocking state
[ 400.944119][ T2766] br0: port 1(s0) entered forwarding state
[ 401.128792][ T2792] bond0: (slave eth1): making interface the new active one
[ 401.130771][ T2792] bond0: (slave eth1): Enslaving as an active interface with an up link
[ 401.131643][ T69] br0: port 2(s1) entered blocking state
[ 401.132067][ T69] br0: port 2(s1) entered forwarding state
[ 401.346201][ T2793] bond0: (slave eth2): Enslaving as a backup interface with an up link
[ 401.348414][ T50] br0: port 4(s2) entered blocking state
[ 401.348857][ T50] br0: port 4(s2) entered forwarding state
[ 401.519669][ T250] bond0: (slave eth0): link status definitely down, disabling slave
[ 401.526522][ T250] bond0: (slave eth1): link status definitely down, disabling slave
[ 401.526986][ T250] bond0: (slave eth2): making interface the new active one
[ 401.629470][ T250] bond0: (slave eth0): link status definitely up
[ 401.630089][ T250] bond0: (slave eth1): link status definitely up
[...]
# TEST: prio (active-backup ns_ip6_target primary_reselect 1) [FAIL]
# Current active slave is eth2 but not eth1
Fix it by setting active slave to primary slave specifically before
testing.
[1] https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-bonding-dbg/results/464301/1-bond-options-sh/stdout
Fixes: 481b56e0391e ("selftests: bonding: re-format bond option tests")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
---
v2: fix some typos in the commit description.
---
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh
index d508486cc0bd..9a3d3c389dad 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.sh
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ prio_test()
# create bond
bond_reset "${param}"
+ # set active_slave to primary eth1 specifically
+ ip -n ${s_ns} link set bond0 type bond active_slave eth1
# check bonding member prio value
ip -n ${s_ns} link set eth0 type bond_slave prio 0
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists