[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95174361-e247-4792-866b-d77152659fd6@moroto.mountain>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:22:12 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev, Jeremy Kerr <jk@...econstruct.com.au>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: lkp@...el.com, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>,
Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/11] net: mctp: provide a more specific tag
allocation ioctl
Hi Jeremy,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jeremy-Kerr/net-mctp-avoid-confusion-over-local-peer-dest-source-addresses/20240216-163203
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/424009ba3e320ae93eb6bd44ef5e474aa5c9221f.1708071380.git.jk%40codeconstruct.com.au
patch subject: [PATCH net-next 06/11] net: mctp: provide a more specific tag allocation ioctl
config: parisc-randconfig-r081-20240218 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240218/202402181713.OQAPBmZC-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202402181713.OQAPBmZC-lkp@intel.com/
smatch warnings:
net/mctp/af_mctp.c:389 mctp_ioctl_tag_copy_from_user() warn: was && intended here instead of ||?
vim +389 net/mctp/af_mctp.c
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 356 static int mctp_ioctl_tag_copy_from_user(unsigned long arg,
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 357 struct mctp_ioc_tag_ctl2 *ctl,
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 358 bool tagv2)
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 359 {
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 360 struct mctp_ioc_tag_ctl ctl_compat;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 361 unsigned long size;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 362 void *ptr;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 363 int rc;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 364
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 365 if (tagv2) {
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 366 size = sizeof(*ctl);
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 367 ptr = ctl;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 368 } else {
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 369 size = sizeof(ctl_compat);
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 370 ptr = &ctl_compat;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 371 }
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 372
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 373 rc = copy_from_user(ptr, (void __user *)arg, size);
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 374 if (rc)
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 375 return -EFAULT;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 376
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 377 if (!tagv2) {
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 378 /* compat, using defaults for new fields */
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 379 ctl->net = MCTP_INITIAL_DEFAULT_NET;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 380 ctl->peer_addr = ctl_compat.peer_addr;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 381 ctl->local_addr = MCTP_ADDR_ANY;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 382 ctl->flags = ctl_compat.flags;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 383 ctl->tag = ctl_compat.tag;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 384 }
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 385
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 386 if (ctl->flags)
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 387 return -EINVAL;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 388
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 @389 if (!(ctl->local_addr != MCTP_ADDR_ANY ||
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 390 ctl->local_addr != MCTP_ADDR_NULL))
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 391 return -EINVAL;
Should be &&. This function will always return -EINVAL. I haven't
looked at the context outside of this automatically generated email but
it suggests a failure in our test process.
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 392
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 393 return 0;
28828bad95a357 Jeremy Kerr 2024-02-16 394 }
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists