| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <65fc62ec-269a-4225-9252-127531179bb0@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:45:01 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <arunpravin.paneerselvam@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Maíra Canal
<mcanal@...lia.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Cassio Neri <cassio.neri@...il.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Arthur Grillo <arthur.grillo@....br>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] drm: tests: Fix invalid printf format specifiers in
KUnit tests
Am 21.02.24 um 10:27 schrieb David Gow:
> The drm_buddy_test's alloc_contiguous test used a u64 for the page size,
> which was then updated to be an 'unsigned long' to avoid 64-bit
> multiplication division helpers.
>
> However, the variable is logged by some KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG() using the
> '%d' or '%llu' format specifiers, the former of which is always wrong,
> and the latter is no longer correct now that ps is no longer a u64. Fix
> these to all use '%lu'.
>
> Also, drm_mm_test calls KUNIT_FAIL() with an empty string as the
> message. gcc warns if a printf format string is empty (apparently), so
> give these some more detailed error messages, which should be more
> useful anyway.
>
> Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous test")
> Fixes: fca7526b7d89 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix build failure on 32-bit targets")
> Fixes: fc8d29e298cf ("drm: selftest: convert drm_mm selftest to KUnit")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
Ping me if you want this patch pushed upstream through the DRM tree.
Christian.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 14 +++++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
> index 8a464f7f4c61..3dbfa3078449 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
> @@ -55,30 +55,30 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
> drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
> ps, ps, list, 0),
> - "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
> + "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%lu\n",
> ps);
> } while (++i < n_pages);
>
> KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
> 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
> - "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
> + "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%lu\n", 3 * ps);
>
> drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
> 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
> - "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
> + "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%lu\n", 3 * ps);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
> 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
> - "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
> + "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%lu\n", 2 * ps);
>
> drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
> 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
> - "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
> + "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%lu\n", 3 * ps);
> /*
> * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 2 blocks,
> * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and right) so
> @@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
> 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
> - "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
> + "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%lu\n", 2 * ps);
>
> drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
> 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
> - "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
> + "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%lu\n", 3 * ps);
>
> total = 0;
> list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c
> index 1eb0c304f960..f37c0d765865 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static void drm_test_mm_init(struct kunit *test)
>
> /* After creation, it should all be one massive hole */
> if (!assert_one_hole(test, &mm, 0, size)) {
> - KUNIT_FAIL(test, "");
> + KUNIT_FAIL(test, "mm not one hole on creation");
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -171,14 +171,14 @@ static void drm_test_mm_init(struct kunit *test)
>
> /* After filling the range entirely, there should be no holes */
> if (!assert_no_holes(test, &mm)) {
> - KUNIT_FAIL(test, "");
> + KUNIT_FAIL(test, "mm has holes when filled");
> goto out;
> }
>
> /* And then after emptying it again, the massive hole should be back */
> drm_mm_remove_node(&tmp);
> if (!assert_one_hole(test, &mm, 0, size)) {
> - KUNIT_FAIL(test, "");
> + KUNIT_FAIL(test, "mm does not have single hole after emptying");
> goto out;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists