[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240221232839.GY13330@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 19:28:39 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Jijie Shao <shaojijie@...wei.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@...lanox.com>, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64/io: Provide a WC friendly __iowriteXX_copy()
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 07:22:06PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:17:08PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > +static inline void __const_memcpy_toio_aligned64(volatile u64 __iomem *to,
> > + const u64 *from, size_t count)
> > +{
> > + switch (count) {
> > + case 8:
> > + asm volatile("str %x0, [%8, #8 * 0]\n"
> > + "str %x1, [%8, #8 * 1]\n"
> > + "str %x2, [%8, #8 * 2]\n"
> > + "str %x3, [%8, #8 * 3]\n"
> > + "str %x4, [%8, #8 * 4]\n"
> > + "str %x5, [%8, #8 * 5]\n"
> > + "str %x6, [%8, #8 * 6]\n"
> > + "str %x7, [%8, #8 * 7]\n"
> > + :
> > + : "rZ"(from[0]), "rZ"(from[1]), "rZ"(from[2]),
> > + "rZ"(from[3]), "rZ"(from[4]), "rZ"(from[5]),
> > + "rZ"(from[6]), "rZ"(from[7]), "r"(to));
> > + break;
> > + case 4:
> > + asm volatile("str %x0, [%4, #8 * 0]\n"
> > + "str %x1, [%4, #8 * 1]\n"
> > + "str %x2, [%4, #8 * 2]\n"
> > + "str %x3, [%4, #8 * 3]\n"
> > + :
> > + : "rZ"(from[0]), "rZ"(from[1]), "rZ"(from[2]),
> > + "rZ"(from[3]), "r"(to));
> > + break;
> > + case 2:
> > + asm volatile("str %x0, [%2, #8 * 0]\n"
> > + "str %x1, [%2, #8 * 1]\n"
> > + :
> > + : "rZ"(from[0]), "rZ"(from[1]), "r"(to));
> > + break;
> > + case 1:
> > + __raw_writel(*from, to);
>
> Shouldn't this be __raw_writeq?
Yes! Thanks
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists