[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874je0c2x5.fsf@kurt.kurt.home>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 09:35:02 +0100
From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>, Maciej Fijalkowski
<maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Sebastian
Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Song Yoong Siang
<yoong.siang.song@...el.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: stmmac and XDP/ZC issue
On Wed Feb 21 2024, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:59:10PM +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:21:04AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>> > On Wed Feb 21 2024, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>> > > On Tue Feb 20 2024, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>> > >> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:43 AM Maciej Fijalkowski
>> > >> <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:18:54PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
>> > >>> > Hi Kurt
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 12:02:25PM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
>> > >>> > > Hello netdev community,
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > after updating to v6.8 kernel I've encountered an issue in the stmmac
>> > >>> > > driver.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > I have an application which makes use of XDP zero-copy sockets. It works
>> > >>> > > on v6.7. On v6.8 it results in the stack trace shown below. The program
>> > >>> > > counter points to:
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > - ./include/net/xdp_sock.h:192 and
>> > >>> > > - ./drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c:2681
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > It seems to be caused by the XDP meta data patches. This one in
>> > >>> > > particular 1347b419318d ("net: stmmac: Add Tx HWTS support to XDP ZC").
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > To reproduce:
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > - Hardware: imx93
>> > >>> > > - Run ptp4l/phc2sys
>> > >>> > > - Configure Qbv, Rx steering, NAPI threading
>> > >>> > > - Run my application using XDP/ZC on queue 1
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > Any idea what might be the issue here?
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > Thanks,
>> > >>> > > Kurt
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > Stack trace:
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > |[ 169.248150] imx-dwmac 428a0000.ethernet eth1: configured EST
>> > >>> > > |[ 191.820913] imx-dwmac 428a0000.ethernet eth1: EST: SWOL has been switched
>> > >>> > > |[ 226.039166] imx-dwmac 428a0000.ethernet eth1: entered promiscuous mode
>> > >>> > > |[ 226.203262] imx-dwmac 428a0000.ethernet eth1: Register MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL RxQ-0
>> > >>> > > |[ 226.203753] imx-dwmac 428a0000.ethernet eth1: Register MEM_TYPE_PAGE_POOL RxQ-1
>> > >>> > > |[ 226.303337] imx-dwmac 428a0000.ethernet eth1: Register MEM_TYPE_XSK_BUFF_POOL RxQ-1
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822584] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822602] Mem abort info:
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822604] ESR = 0x0000000096000044
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822608] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822613] SET = 0, FnV = 0
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822616] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822618] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822622] Data abort info:
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822624] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000044, ISS2 = 0x00000000
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822627] CM = 0, WnR = 1, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822630] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822634] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000085fe1000
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822638] [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822650] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000044 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822655] Modules linked in:
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822660] CPU: 0 PID: 751 Comm: napi/eth1-261 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-rt4-00100-g9c63d995ca19 #8
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822666] Hardware name: NXP i.MX93 11X11 EVK board (DT)
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822669] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822674] pc : stmmac_tx_clean.constprop.0+0x848/0xc38
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822690] lr : stmmac_tx_clean.constprop.0+0x844/0xc38
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822696] sp : ffff800085ec3bc0
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822698] x29: ffff800085ec3bc0 x28: ffff000005b609e0 x27: 0000000000000001
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822706] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff000005b60ae0 x24: 0000000000000001
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822712] x23: 0000000000000001 x22: ffff000005b649e0 x21: 0000000000000000
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822719] x20: 0000000000000020 x19: ffff800085291030 x18: 0000000000000000
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822725] x17: ffff7ffffc51c000 x16: ffff800080000000 x15: 0000000000000008
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822732] x14: ffff80008369b880 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000008507
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822738] x11: 0000000000000040 x10: 0000000000000a70 x9 : ffff800080e32f84
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822745] x8 : 0000000000000000 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000003ff0
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822751] x5 : 0000000000003c40 x4 : ffff000005b60000 x3 : 0000000000000000
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822757] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822764] Call trace:
>> > >>> > > |[ 255.822766] stmmac_tx_clean.constprop.0+0x848/0xc38
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Shouldn't xsk_tx_metadata_complete() be called only when corresponding
>> > >>> buf_type is STMMAC_TXBUF_T_XSK_TX?
>> > >>
>> > >> +1. I'm assuming Serge isn't enabling it explicitly, so none of the
>> > >> metadata stuff should trigger in this case.
>> > >
>> > > The only other user of xsk_tx_metadata_complete() in mlx5 guards it with
>> > > xp_tx_metadata_enabled(). Seems like that's missing in stmmac?
>> >
>> > Well, the following patch seems to help:
>> >
>> > commit e85ab4b97b4d6e50036435ac9851b876c221f580
>> > Author: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
>> > Date: Wed Feb 21 08:18:15 2024 +0100
>> >
>> > net: stmmac: Complete meta data only when enabled
>> >
>> > Currently using XDP sockets on stmmac results in a kernel crash:
>> >
>> > |[ 255.822584] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000
>> > |[...]
>> > |[ 255.822764] Call trace:
>> > |[ 255.822766] stmmac_tx_clean.constprop.0+0x848/0xc38
>> >
>> > The program counter indicates xsk_tx_metadata_complete(). However, this
>> > function shouldn't be called unless metadata is actually enabled.
>> >
>> > Tested on imx93.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 1347b419318d ("net: stmmac: Add Tx HWTS support to XDP ZC")
>> > Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> > index 9df27f03a8cb..77c62b26342d 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> > @@ -2678,9 +2678,10 @@ static int stmmac_tx_clean(struct stmmac_priv *priv, int budget, u32 queue,
>> > .desc = p,
>> > };
>> >
>> > - xsk_tx_metadata_complete(&tx_q->tx_skbuff_dma[entry].xsk_meta,
>> > - &stmmac_xsk_tx_metadata_ops,
>> > - &tx_compl);
>> > + if (xp_tx_metadata_enabled(tx_q->xsk_pool))
>>
>
>> every other usage of tx metadata functions should be wrapped with
>> xp_tx_metadata_enabled() - can you address other places and send a proper
>> patch?
>
> AFAICS this is the only place. But the change above still isn't enough
> to fix the problem. In my case XDP zero-copy isn't activated. So
> xsk_pool isn't allocated and the NULL/~NULL dereference is still
> persistent due to xp_tx_metadata_enabled() dereferencing the
> NULL-structure fields. The attached patched fixes the problem in my
> case.
Sure about that? In my case without ZC the else path is not executed,
because skb is set.
>
> Kurt, are you sure that xp_tx_metadata_enabled() is required in your
> case?
Yes, I'm sure it's required, because I do use ZC without using any
metadata.
> Could you test the attached patch with the xp_tx_metadata_enabled()
> invocation discarded?
Well, it works. But, the xp_tx_metadata_enabled() is not discarded in
the ZC case:
|RtcRxThread-790 [001] b...3 202.970243: stmmac_tx_clean.constprop.0: huhu from xp_tx_metadata_enabled
Let's go with your version of the patch. It works without XDP, with XDP
and XDP/ZC. I'll send it upstream.
Thanks for the help :).
Thanks,
Kurt
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (862 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists