[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4bf0c575-8059-46b9-8677-2c0de18ffcf6@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 17:04:21 -0800
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "Keller, Jacob E"
<jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Elliott, Rob"
<elliott@....com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v1] ice: fix NULL pointer access during resume
On 2/22/2024 2:25 PM, Tony Nguyen wrote:
>> I think he means that the tests won't pass without Amritha's patch
>> because we'll hit the ASSERT_RTNL in the suspend flow otherwise.
>
> Got it. Anyways, this doesn't apply to net-queue, could we rebase or
> base it off of that tree?
Ok, will send v2 off -net.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists