[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <59ae7d89368a4dd5a8b8b3f7bc2ae957@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 21:26:31 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Netdev
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, "Matthew
Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, Christoph Hellwig
<hch@...radead.org>, "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Jani Nikula
<jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH next v2 08/11] minmax: Add min_const() and max_const()
...
> Yes, yes, that may end up requiring getting rid of some current users of
>
> #define MIN(a,b) ((a)<(b) ? (a):(b))
>
> but dammit, we don't actually have _that_ many of them, and why should
> we have random drivers doing that anyway?
They look like they could be changed to min().
It is even likely the header gets pulled in somewhere.
I'm not sure about the ones in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/*..*/*.c, but it
wouldn't surprise me if that code doesn't use any standard kernel headers.
Isn't that also the code that manages to pass 42 integer parameters
to functions?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists