netdev - Re: [PATCH next v2 08/11] minmax: Add min_const() and max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPM=9tyJQw2OPP=-WTozVuvzRiRrkk-BtZ+82MQCuUmjXBLKbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 11:11:09 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, 
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, 
	"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, 
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next v2 08/11] minmax: Add min_const() and max_const()

On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 07:26, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
>
> ...
> > Yes, yes, that may end up requiring getting rid of some current users of
> >
> >   #define MIN(a,b) ((a)<(b) ? (a):(b))
> >
> > but dammit, we don't actually have _that_ many of them, and why should
> > we have random drivers doing that anyway?
>
> They look like they could be changed to min().
> It is even likely the header gets pulled in somewhere.
>
> I'm not sure about the ones in drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/*..*/*.c, but it
> wouldn't surprise me if that code doesn't use any standard kernel headers.
> Isn't that also the code that manages to pass 42 integer parameters
> to functions?

They are all separate in C files, I think we could get rid of them
pretty easily in favour of the standard ones,

Adding Harry to cc.

Dave.