[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240228124801.GC292522@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:48:01 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 13/17] net: pse-pd: Use regulator framework
within PSE framework
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 03:42:55PM +0100, Kory Maincent wrote:
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/pse-pd/pse.h b/include/linux/pse-pd/pse.h
> index 522115cc6cef..a3e297cc2150 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pse-pd/pse.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pse-pd/pse.h
> @@ -55,10 +55,10 @@ struct pse_controller_ops {
> int (*ethtool_get_status)(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev,
> unsigned long id, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> struct pse_control_status *status);
> - int (*ethtool_set_config)(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev,
> - unsigned long id, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
> - const struct pse_control_config *config);
> int (*setup_pi_matrix)(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev);
> + int (*pi_is_enabled)(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev, int id);
> + int (*pi_enable)(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev, int id);
> + int (*pi_disable)(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev, int id);
Hi Kory,
Please update the Kernel doc for struct pse_controller_ops to reflect the
added and removed fields.
> };
>
> struct module;
> @@ -90,10 +90,14 @@ struct pse_pi_pairset {
> *
> * @pairset: table of the PSE PI pinout alternative for the two pairset
> * @np: device node pointer of the PSE PI node
> + * @rdev: regulator represented by the PSE PI
> + * @enabled: PI enabled state
> */
> struct pse_pi {
> struct pse_pi_pairset pairset[2];
> struct device_node *np;
> + struct regulator_dev *rdev;
> + bool enabled;
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -107,6 +111,8 @@ struct pse_pi {
> * @of_pse_n_cells: number of cells in PSE line specifiers
> * @nr_lines: number of PSE controls in this controller device
> * @lock: Mutex for serialization access to the PSE controller
> + * @lock_owner: current owner of the mutex
> + * @ref_cnt: mutex's reference count
These newly documented fields don't seem to exist in struct
pse_controller_dev. Perhaps this is an left over from earlier development?
> * @types: types of the PSE controller
> * @pi: table of PSE PIs described in this controller device
> * @of_legacy: flag set if the pse_pis devicetree node is not used
> @@ -132,7 +138,8 @@ struct device;
> int devm_pse_controller_register(struct device *dev,
> struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev);
>
> -struct pse_control *of_pse_control_get(struct device_node *node);
> +struct pse_control *of_pse_control_get(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_node *node);
> void pse_control_put(struct pse_control *psec);
>
> int pse_ethtool_get_status(struct pse_control *psec,
> @@ -147,7 +154,8 @@ bool pse_has_c33(struct pse_control *psec);
>
> #else
>
> -static inline struct pse_control *of_pse_control_get(struct device_node *node)
> +static inline struct pse_control *of_pse_control_get(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_node *node)
> {
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists