[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240228175158.04c0aa1b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:51:58 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>, Palmer
Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@...lbox.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] kunit: Fix again checksum tests on big endian CPUs
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:06:41 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 07:44 +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Le 23/02/2024 à 11:41, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
> > > Commit b38460bc463c ("kunit: Fix checksum tests on big endian CPUs")
> > > fixed endianness issues with kunit checksum tests, but then
> > > commit 6f4c45cbcb00 ("kunit: Add tests for csum_ipv6_magic and
> > > ip_fast_csum") introduced new issues on big endian CPUs. Those issues
> > > are once again reflected by the warnings reported by sparse.
> > >
> > > So, fix them with the same approach, perform proper conversion in
> > > order to support both little and big endian CPUs. Once the conversions
> > > are properly done and the right types used, the sparse warnings are
> > > cleared as well.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@...lbox.org>
> > > Fixes: 6f4c45cbcb00 ("kunit: Add tests for csum_ipv6_magic and ip_fast_csum")
> > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
> >
> > netdev checkpatch complains about "1 blamed authors not CCed:
> > palmer@...osinc.com; 1 maintainers not CCed: palmer@...osinc.com "
> >
> > Palmer was copied but as Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>. Hope it is
> > not a show stopper.
>
> No, it's not.
>
> Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
>
> I *think* this, despite the subject prefix, should go via Andrew's tree
> to avoid conflicts.
>
> @Andrew does the above fits you?
I don't see this in linux-next, so unless told otherwise I'll merge it
and ship to Linus tomorrow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists