[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-27f419e8-9551-4a63-a74a-cede3f9d2614@palmer-ri-x1c9>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:55:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: kuba@...nel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>, erhard_f@...lbox.org,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] kunit: Fix again checksum tests on big endian CPUs
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:51:58 PST (-0800), kuba@...nel.org wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:06:41 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> On Sat, 2024-02-24 at 07:44 +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Le 23/02/2024 à 11:41, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>> > > Commit b38460bc463c ("kunit: Fix checksum tests on big endian CPUs")
>> > > fixed endianness issues with kunit checksum tests, but then
>> > > commit 6f4c45cbcb00 ("kunit: Add tests for csum_ipv6_magic and
>> > > ip_fast_csum") introduced new issues on big endian CPUs. Those issues
>> > > are once again reflected by the warnings reported by sparse.
>> > >
>> > > So, fix them with the same approach, perform proper conversion in
>> > > order to support both little and big endian CPUs. Once the conversions
>> > > are properly done and the right types used, the sparse warnings are
>> > > cleared as well.
>> > >
>> > > Reported-by: Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@...lbox.org>
>> > > Fixes: 6f4c45cbcb00 ("kunit: Add tests for csum_ipv6_magic and ip_fast_csum")
>> > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>> >
>> > netdev checkpatch complains about "1 blamed authors not CCed:
>> > palmer@...osinc.com; 1 maintainers not CCed: palmer@...osinc.com "
>> >
>> > Palmer was copied but as Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>. Hope it is
>> > not a show stopper.
>>
>> No, it's not.
>>
>> Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
>>
>> I *think* this, despite the subject prefix, should go via Andrew's tree
>> to avoid conflicts.
>>
>> @Andrew does the above fits you?
>
> I don't see this in linux-next, so unless told otherwise I'll merge it
> and ship to Linus tomorrow.
Sorry, I thought I'd Ack'd this at some point -- I might have just
gotten lost, though, as IIRC there were a few of these floating around.
I'm fine with anyone taking it, so
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists