netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] add two missing addresses when using trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 09:21:51 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] add two missing addresses when using trace

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 8:01 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 1:10 AM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
> >
> > When I reviewed other people's patch [1], I noticed that similar thing
> > also happens in tcp_event_skb class and tcp_event_sk_skb class. They
> > don't print those two addrs of skb/sk which already exist.
> >
> > They are probably forgotten by the original authors, so this time I
> > finish the work. Also, adding more trace about the socket/skb addr can
> > help us sometime even though the chance is minor.
> >
> > I don't consider it is a bug, thus I chose to target net-next tree.
>
> Gentle ping...No rush. Just in case this simple patchset was lost for
> some reason.

This was a conscious choice I think.

https://yhbt.net/lore/all/20171010173821.6djxyvrggvaivqec@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com/