netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v9 02/13] net: Make dev_get_hwtstamp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240305110233.2aca99f7@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 11:02:33 +0100
From: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Broadcom internal
 kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, Andrew Lunn
 <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
 <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Richard
 Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Radu Pirea
 <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>, Andy
 Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, Nicolas Ferre
 <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet
 <corbet@....net>, Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
 UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Vladimir
 Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Thomas Petazzoni
 <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Maxime Chevallier
 <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 02/13] net: Make dev_get_hwtstamp_phylib
 accessible

On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 10:56:27 +0100
Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com> wrote:

> > > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > index f07c8374f29c..7f78aef73fe1 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> > > @@ -4005,6 +4005,8 @@ int generic_hwtstamp_set_lower(struct net_device
> > > *dev, int dev_set_hwtstamp_phylib(struct net_device *dev,
> > >  			    struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *cfg,
> > >  			    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> > > +int dev_get_hwtstamp_phylib(struct net_device *dev,
> > > +			    struct kernel_hwtstamp_config *cfg);    
> > 
> > since we don't expect modules to call this, how about we move dev_set*
> > and the new declaration to net/core/dev.h ?  
> 
> Ok for me.

I replied to quickly.
It seems this header in not include in ethtool part. 
This would imply adding #include "../core/dev.h" in the tsinfo.c file.
Not sure this is what we want.

Regards,
-- 
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com