netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add SR1.0-specific description bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZecvKo1HDAXD0n7Q@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 14:41:46 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...mens.com>
Cc: danishanwar@...com, rogerq@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	andrew@...n.ch, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add
 SR1.0-specific description bits

On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 11:40:25AM +0000, Diogo Ivo wrote:
> +struct emac_tx_ts_response_sr1 {
> +	u32 lo_ts;
> +	u32 hi_ts;
> +	u32 reserved;
> +	u32 cookie;
> +};

In patch 10, this comes from skb->data, so seems to be a packet. Is the
data dependent on the host endian, or is it always little endian?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!