[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240306184611.0cea20af@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 18:46:11 +0100
From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Ratheesh Kannoth <rkannoth@...vell.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] net: wan: Add support for QMC
HDLC
Hi Jakub,
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 08:22:30 -0800
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 16:01:48 +0000 Ratheesh Kannoth wrote:
> > > > > + struct qmc_hdlc_desc *desc = context;
> > > > > + struct net_device *netdev = desc->netdev;
> > > > > + struct qmc_hdlc *qmc_hdlc = netdev_to_qmc_hdlc(netdev);
> > > > Reverse xmas tree
> > >
> > > The reverse xmas tree order cannot be used here.
> > > qmc_hdlc depends on netdev, netdev depends on desc.
> > >
> > ACK. Usually I get comments to split declaration and assignment for
> > my patches in upstream.
>
> Yup, that's our general preference, to split the init out of
> the definition.
Does it mean that I need to update in a next iteration ?
Best regards,
Hervé
Powered by blists - more mailing lists