[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240308145426.7eb4b043@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 14:54:26 +0100
From: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Luis Chamberlain
<mcgrof@...nel.org>, Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>, Greg
Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner
Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/17] net: Add support for Power over
Ethernet (PoE)
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 10:31:05 -0500
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:43 AM Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > This patch series aims at adding support for PoE (Power over Ethernet),
> > based on the already existing support for PoDL (Power over Data Line)
> > implementation. In addition, it adds support for two specific PoE
> > controller, the Microchip PD692x0 and the TI TPS23881.
> >
> > This patch series is sponsored by Dent Project
> > <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>.
>
> Sorry, couldnt resist because it sounded like a commercial;-> And
> likely i am out of touch. I am all for giving credit but does it have
> to be explicitly called out as "this patch is sponsored by X"?
Hello Jamal,
I will remove the line and add it in the From field as suggested by Jakub.
It seems to be the usual way to do it.
Regards,
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists