lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240311085632.2d0742e6@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 08:56:32 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org,
 fw@...len.de, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: dccp: try not to drop
 skb in conntrack

On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:37:25 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> I saw the status in patchwork was changed, but I've not received the
> comments. So I spent some time learning how it works in the netfilter
> area.
> 
> I just noticed that there are two trees (nf and nf-next), so should I
> target nf-next and resend this patch and another one[1]?

I don't think you need to repost, you CCed the right people, they
should be able to process the patches. But do keep in mind the
netfilter trees on next patches.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ