netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: dccp: try not to drop skb in conntrack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:37 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org, 
	fw@...len.de, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, 
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org, 
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] netfilter: conntrack: dccp: try not to drop skb
 in conntrack

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:56 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 14:37:25 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> > I saw the status in patchwork was changed, but I've not received the
> > comments. So I spent some time learning how it works in the netfilter
> > area.
> >
> > I just noticed that there are two trees (nf and nf-next), so should I
> > target nf-next and resend this patch and another one[1]?
>
> I don't think you need to repost, you CCed the right people, they
> should be able to process the patches. But do keep in mind the
> netfilter trees on next patches.

Thanks for the clarification :)