lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:59:23 +0300
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To: Justin Swartz <justin.swartz@...ingedge.co.za>,
 Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
 Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean
 <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mt7530: increase reset hold time

On 12.03.2024 22:21, Justin Swartz wrote:
> Increase the MT7530 reset hold period from 1000-1100 usec
> to 5000-5100 usec.
> 
> This should reduce the likelihood of an incorrect external
> crystal frequency selection which may occur when reset is
> deasserted too early under certain link conditions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Justin Swartz <justin.swartz@...ingedge.co.za>
> ---
>   drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> index 3c1f65759..5e9e1381a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> @@ -2243,11 +2243,11 @@ mt7530_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>   	 */
>   	if (priv->mcm) {
>   		reset_control_assert(priv->rstc);
> -		usleep_range(1000, 1100);
> +		usleep_range(5000, 5100);
>   		reset_control_deassert(priv->rstc);
>   	} else {
>   		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset, 0);
> -		usleep_range(1000, 1100);
> +		usleep_range(5000, 5100);
>   		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(priv->reset, 1);
>   	}
>   

Again, the patch subject is missing the indication of a tree. Read the
networking subsystem (netdev) development page [1].

This ship has sailed anyway. Now the changes the first patch did must be
reverted too. I will deal with this from now on, you can stop sending
patches regarding this.

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

Arınç

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ