[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZfF7M7C/EAu8Umb0@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:08:51 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH xfrm] xfrm: Allow UDP encapsulation only in offload modes
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 01:24:31PM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 13:55 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> >
> > The missing check of x->encap caused to the situation where GSO packets
> > were created with UDP encapsulation.
> >
> > As a solution return the encap check for non-offloaded SA.
> >
> > Fixes: 9f2b55961a80 ("xfrm: Pass UDP encapsulation in TX packet offload")
>
> Should be:
>
> Fixes: 983a73da1f99 ("xfrm: Pass UDP encapsulation in TX packet offload")
>
> @Steffen: I guess you want to apply it first in your tree and send it later as PR?
> In such case, could you please adjust the fixes hash while at it?
Yes, I'll adjust the fixes tag.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists