lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALGdzurhU95jn7q71fb5Dq0QZ2dB1hHLNbX2zR=32gB6nRHjmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:29:06 -0500
From: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, 
	pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, zzjas98@...il.com
Subject: Re: [net/devlink] Question about possible CMD misuse in devlink_nl_port_new_doit()

Thank you so much for your prompt reply and fix!

Best,
Chenyuan

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 4:21 AM Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>
> Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 03:57:19AM CET, chenyuan0y@...il.com wrote:
> >Dear Devlink Developers,
> >
> >We are curious whether the function `devlink_nl_port_new_doit()` might have a incorrect command value `DEVLINK_CMD_NEW`, which should be `DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_NEW`.
> >
> >The function is https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/net/devlink/port.c#L844
> >and the relevant code is
> >```
> >int devlink_nl_port_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> >{
> >       ...
> >       err = devlink_nl_port_fill(msg, devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW,
> >                                  info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq, 0, NULL);
> >       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(err))
> >               goto err_out_msg_free;
> >       ...
> >}
> >```
> >
> >In `devlink_nl_port_fill`, all other places use `DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_NEW` as the command value. However, in `devlink_nl_port_new_doit`, it uses `DEVLINK_CMD_NEW`. This might be a misuse, also according to https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240216113147.50797-1-jiri@resnulli.us/T/.
> >
> >Based on our understanding, a possible fix would be
> >```
> >-  err = devlink_nl_port_fill(msg, devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW,
> >+  err = devlink_nl_port_fill(msg, devlink_port, DEVLINK_CMD_PORT_NEW,
> >```
> >
> >Please kindly correct us if we missed any key information. Looking forward to your response!
>
> You are correct, this is a bug. Thanks for report!
> Here's the fix:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240318091908.2736542-1-jiri@resnulli.us/
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ