[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878e72e6-8a75-4593-8080-e3d9b3f7f523@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:07:42 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: broadcom-bluetooth: Add CYW43439 DT
binding
On 3/17/24 4:03 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 04:15:12AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> CYW43439 is a Wi-Fi + Bluetooth combo device from Infineon.
>> The Bluetooth part is capable of Bluetooth 5.2 BR/EDR/LE .
>> This chip is present e.g. on muRata 1YN module. Extend the
>> binding with its DT compatible.
>
> How come there's no fallback here? Looking at the binding patch there's
> no device-specific handling done, what's incompatibly different between
> this device and some of the other ones supported by the hci_bcm driver?
For posterity, should be addressed in V2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists