[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6cb585f6-6da8-45a2-a28b-2fb556f95672@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 20:38:03 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
René van Dorst <opensource@...rst.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
SkyLake Huang <SkyLake.Huang@...iatek.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>,
mithat.guner@...ont.com, erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix EEE support for MT7531 and MT7988 SoC switch
> I would argue that EEE advertisement on the PHY should be enabled by
> default.
That is an open question at the moment. For some use cases, it can add
extra delay and jitter which can cause problems. I've heard people
doing PTP don't like EEE for example.
The current phylib core code leaves the PHY advertisement whatever its
reset default is. So we leave it to the manufacture to decide if it
should be enabled or disabled by default. It is policy, so it should
really be down to user space to configure EEE how it wants it.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists