[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5fde8ace-a0ac-4870-a7fe-ec2a24697112@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:49:19 -0500
From: Zijie Zhao <zzjas98@...il.com>
To: horms@...ge.net.au, ja@....bg, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, chenyuan0y@...il.com
Subject: [net] Question about ipvs->sysctl_sync_threshold and READ_ONCE
Dear IPVS maintainers,
We encountered an unusual usage of sysctl parameter while analyzing
kernel source code.
In include/net/ip_vs.h, line 1062 - 1070:
```
static inline int sysctl_sync_threshold(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
{
return ipvs->sysctl_sync_threshold[0];
}
static inline int sysctl_sync_period(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs)
{
return READ_ONCE(ipvs->sysctl_sync_threshold[1]);
}
```
Here, sysctl_sync_threshold[1] is accessed behind `READ_ONCE`, but
sysctl_sync_threshold[0] is not. Should sysctl_sync_threshold[0] also be
guarded by `READ_ONCE`?
Please kindly let us know if we missed any key information and this is
actually intended. We appreciate your information and time! Thanks!
Links to the code:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8.1/source/include/net/ip_vs.h#L1064
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8.1/source/include/net/ip_vs.h#L1069
Best,
Zijie
Powered by blists - more mailing lists