netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] virtio-net: support device stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:12:23 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Michael
 S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, Alexei
 Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend
 <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Amritha
 Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>, Larysa Zaremba
 <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>, Sridhar Samudrala
 <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,  Maciej Fijalkowski
 <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] virtio-net: support device stats

On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 13:19 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:53:38PM CET, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:52:18 +0100, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> > > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:05:53PM CET, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com wrote:
> > > > As the spec:
> > > > 
> > > > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/commit/42f389989823039724f95bbbd243291ab0064f82
> > > > 
> > > > The virtio net supports to get device stats.
> > > > 
> > > > Please review.
> > > 
> > > net-next is closed. Please resubmit next week.
> > 
> > 
> > For review.
> 
> RFC, or wait.

@Xuan, please note that you received exactly the same feedback on your
previous submission, a few days ago. While I do understand the legit
interest in reviews, ignoring explicit feedback tend to bring no
feedback at all.

Paolo