netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] virtio-net: support device stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 16:04:21 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric  Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 "Michael  S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
 Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
 Alexei  Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
 Amritha  Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>,
 Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>,
 Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
 Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
 virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] virtio-net: support device stats

On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:12:23 +0100, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-03-18 at 13:19 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:53:38PM CET, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:52:18 +0100, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> > > > Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:05:53PM CET, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com wrote:
> > > > > As the spec:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec/commit/42f389989823039724f95bbbd243291ab0064f82
> > > > >
> > > > > The virtio net supports to get device stats.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please review.
> > > >
> > > > net-next is closed. Please resubmit next week.
> > >
> > >
> > > For review.
> >
> > RFC, or wait.
>
> @Xuan, please note that you received exactly the same feedback on your
> previous submission, a few days ago. While I do understand the legit
> interest in reviews, ignoring explicit feedback tend to bring no
> feedback at all.

Sorry.

I have a question regarding the workflow for feature discussions. If we
consistently engage in discussions about a particular feature, this may result
in the submission of multiple patch sets. In light of this, should we modify the
usage of "PATCH" or "RFC" in our submissions depending on whether the merge
window is open or closed? This causes the title of our patch sets to keep
changing.

Or I miss something.

Thanks.

>
> Paolo
>