[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6f62bef-5766-4fe1-a6f1-6f18d627737e@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:05:43 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: "Jan Petrous (OSS)" <jan.petrous@....nxp.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: don't resume device not in use
> Please note that the 'net-next' tree is closed for the merge window.
> You will have to repost in when the tree will re-open in a week or so.
>
> However this change could be suitable for the 'net' tree, if Andrew
> agrees. If, please re-sent targeting such tree and including a
> reasonable 'Fixes' tag.
This is the sort of change that i think it should only be in net-next.
Suspend/resume is complex and not tested too well. There is a chance
of regression with this change. So we should introduce it slowly.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists