[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <522c63b5-1db0-4e18-9cf3-83bfeadf8c36@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 05:31:46 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: "Jan Petrous (OSS)" <jan.petrous@....nxp.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: don't resume device not in use
On 3/19/2024 5:05 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Please note that the 'net-next' tree is closed for the merge window.
>> You will have to repost in when the tree will re-open in a week or so.
>>
>> However this change could be suitable for the 'net' tree, if Andrew
>> agrees. If, please re-sent targeting such tree and including a
>> reasonable 'Fixes' tag.
>
> This is the sort of change that i think it should only be in net-next.
> Suspend/resume is complex and not tested too well. There is a chance
> of regression with this change. So we should introduce it slowly.
Totally agree.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists