[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240322125727.GE372561@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:57:27 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] ice: Fix freeing uninitialized pointers
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 05:42:12PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Automatically cleaned up pointers need to be initialized before exiting
> their scope. In this case, they need to be initialized to NULL before
> any return statement.
>
> Fixes: 90f821d72e11 ("ice: avoid unnecessary devm_ usage")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> ---
> v2: I missed a couple pointers in v1.
>
> The change to ice_update_link_info() isn't required because it's
> assigned on the very next line... But I did that because it's harmless
> and makes __free() stuff easier to verify. I felt like moving the
> declarations into the code would be controversial and it also ends up
> making the lines really long.
>
> goto goto err_unroll_sched;
>
> struct ice_aqc_get_phy_caps_data *pcaps __free(kfree) =
> kzalloc(sizeof(*pcaps), GFP_KERNEL);
Thanks Dan,
I agree with the approach you have taken here.
And I apologise that it's quite likely that I skipped warnings regarding
these problems when reviewing patches that introduced them - I did not
understand the issue that this patch resolves.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists