[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2024032753-probable-blatancy-80bf@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 17:55:31 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, marcan@...can.st, sven@...npeter.dev,
florian.fainelli@...adcom.com, rjui@...adcom.com,
sbranden@...adcom.com, paul@...pouillou.net,
Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
vireshk@...nel.org, Frank.Li@....com, leoyang.li@....com,
zw@...kernel.org, wangzhou1@...ilicon.com, haijie1@...wei.com,
shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
afaerber@...e.de, logang@...tatee.com, daniel@...que.org,
haojian.zhuang@...il.com, robert.jarzmik@...e.fr,
andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, orsonzhai@...il.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, zhang.lyra@...il.com,
patrice.chotard@...s.st.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
wens@...e.org, jernej.skrabec@...il.com, peter.ujfalusi@...il.com,
kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
decui@...rosoft.com, jassisinghbrar@...il.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
maintainers@...echerrydvr.com, aubin.constans@...rochip.com,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, manuel.lauss@...il.com,
mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl, jh80.chung@...sung.com, oakad@...oo.com,
hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
brucechang@....com.tw, HaraldWelte@...tech.com, pierre@...man.eu,
duncan.sands@...e.fr, stern@...land.harvard.edu, oneukum@...e.com,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] USB: Convert from tasklet to BH workqueue
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 04:03:09PM +0000, Allen Pais wrote:
> The only generic interface to execute asynchronously in the BH context is
> tasklet; however, it's marked deprecated and has some design flaws. To
> replace tasklets, BH workqueue support was recently added. A BH workqueue
> behaves similarly to regular workqueues except that the queued work items
> are executed in the BH context.
>
> This patch converts drivers/infiniband/* from tasklet to BH workqueue.
No it does not, I think your changelog is wrong :(
>
> Based on the work done by Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/wq.git for-6.10
>
> Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c | 55 +++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.h | 3 +-
> drivers/usb/core/hcd.c | 22 ++++++------
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_qe_udc.c | 21 +++++------
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/fsl_qe_udc.h | 4 +--
> drivers/usb/host/ehci-sched.c | 2 +-
> drivers/usb/host/fhci-hcd.c | 3 +-
> drivers/usb/host/fhci-sched.c | 10 +++---
> drivers/usb/host/fhci.h | 5 +--
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgcap.h | 3 +-
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c | 15 ++++----
> include/linux/usb/cdc_ncm.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/usb/usbnet.h | 2 +-
> 13 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c b/drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c
> index 2da6615fbb6f..74849f24e52e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> * - Removed the limit on the number of devices
> * - Module now autoloads on device plugin
> * - Merged relevant parts of sarlib
> - * - Replaced the kernel thread with a tasklet
> + * - Replaced the kernel thread with a work
a "work"?
> * - New packet transmission code
> * - Changed proc file contents
> * - Fixed all known SMP races
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
> #include <linux/wait.h>
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
> #ifdef VERBOSE_DEBUG
> static int usbatm_print_packet(struct usbatm_data *instance, const unsigned char *data, int len);
> @@ -249,7 +250,7 @@ static void usbatm_complete(struct urb *urb)
> /* vdbg("%s: urb 0x%p, status %d, actual_length %d",
> __func__, urb, status, urb->actual_length); */
>
> - /* Can be invoked from task context, protect against interrupts */
> + /* Can be invoked from work context, protect against interrupts */
"workqueue"? This too seems wrong.
Same for other comment changes in this patch.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists