netdev - Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 1/4] Documentation: netlink: add a YAML spec for team

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:22:53 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next 1/4] Documentation: netlink: add a YAML spec
 for team

Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 05:10:01AM CEST, liuhangbin@...il.com wrote:
>Add a YAML specification for team.
>
>Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>

Small note/question below.

[..]


>+    name: attr-option
>+    name-prefix: team-attr-option-
>+    attributes:
>+      -
>+        name: unspec
>+        type: unused
>+        value: 0
>+      -
>+        name: name
>+        type: string
>+        checks:
>+          max-len: string-max-len
>+          unterminated-ok: true
>+      -
>+        name: changed
>+        type: flag
>+      -
>+        name: type
>+        type: u8
>+      -
>+        name: data
>+        type: binary

For the record, this is incomplete as this is not of type "binary" but
rather a type determined by TEAM_ATTR_OPTION_TYPE.
My rejected patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240219172525.71406-7-jiri@resnulli.us/
Makes that possible to be implemented in ynl.

Jakub, still not willing to pull this in?

[..]