[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3326107.1712149095@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 13:58:15 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] mm: Export writeback_iter()
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> > So why are we bothering with EXPORT_SYMBOL at all? Why don't you just
> > send a patch replace all of them with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()?
>
> No my business.
Clearly it is as you're gradually replacing APIs with stuff that is GPL'd.
> But if you want to side track this let me just put this in here:
>
> NAK to the non-GPL EXPORT of writeback_iter().
Very well, I'll switch that export to GPL. Christian, if you can amend that
patch in your tree?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists