[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240403124124.GA19085@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 14:41:24 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] mm: Export writeback_iter()
On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 11:55:00AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> So why are we bothering with EXPORT_SYMBOL at all? Why don't you just send a
> patch replace all of them with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()?
No my business. But if you want to side track this let me just put this
in here:
NAK to the non-GPL EXPORT of writeback_iter().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists