netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: usb: ax88179_178a: non necessary second random mac address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240402183237.2eb8398a@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 18:32:37 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@...hat.com>
Cc: horms@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: usb: ax88179_178a: non necessary
 second random mac address

On Mon,  1 Apr 2024 10:27:25 +0200 Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez wrote:
> If the mac address can not be read from the device registers or the
> devicetree, a random address is generated, but this was already done from
> usbnet_probe, so it is not necessary to call eth_hw_addr_random from here
> again to generate another random address.
> 
> Indeed, when reset was also executed from bind, generate another random mac
> address invalidated the check from usbnet_probe to configure if the assigned
> mac address for the interface was random or not, because it is comparing
> with the initial generated random address. Now, with only a reset from open
> operation, it is just a harmless simplification.

You need to wait for the other patch to get merged,
then on Thursday after that the trees will get merged
together, and then you can post this :(
Otherwise we'll have a conflict.
-- 
pw-bot: defer