[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKsJdDgoVbukfDObR=qSQ5T_93zV7-1C+BBWb_-ks=+xA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 19:55:51 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: remove RTNL protection from ip6addrlbl_dump()
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 7:49 PM David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org> wrote:
> Since this a known change in behavior (however slight), it would be best
> to add something in the commit message or a code comment so if someone
> hits a problem and does a git bisect the problem and solution are clear.
Ok.
The cb->seq / nl_dump_check_consistent() protocol could be implemented later,
if necessary.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists