[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240405224629.1f5a77b7@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 22:46:29 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@...dia.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman
<gal@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] ethtool: add interface to read representor
Rx statistics
On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 22:25:21 -0700 Rahul Rameshbabu wrote:
> > In more trivial remarks - kernel-doc script apparently doesn't want
> > the group to be documented (any more?)
>
> I took a look, and I believe the behavior of kernel-doc has remained the
> same since the struct_group() helper macro was introduced. That said, I
> think allowing the documentation of struct_group() would be a reasonable
> choice/maybe worth updating the script.
Thanks for investigating! Dunno why this started getting hit so much out
of the sudden.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists