[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+qQ0zk4+jua1oiTNz6wqj2r1LTbp+W+d5eUaK38U8THA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 22:47:38 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bonding: no longer use RTNL in bonding_show_queue_id()
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 10:39 PM Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> >Annotate lockless reads of slave->queue_id.
> >
> >Annotate writes of slave->queue_id.
> >
> >Switch bonding_show_queue_id() to rcu_read_lock()
> >and bond_for_each_slave_rcu().
>
> This is combining two logical changes into one patch, isn't it?
> The annotation change isn't part of what's stated in the Subject.
The annotations are really part of this change, otherwise KCSAN might
find races.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists