[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240409184625.301e4bc0@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 18:46:25 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: aleksander.lobakin@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, elder@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
nbd@....name, sean.wang@...iatek.com, Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com,
lorenzo@...nel.org, taras.chornyi@...ision.eu, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
geomatsi@...il.com, kvalo@...nel.org, quic_jjohnson@...cinc.com,
leon@...nel.org, dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Daniel
Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/9] net: free_netdev: exit earlier if dummy
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 05:57:15 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote:
> For dummy devices, exit earlier at free_netdev() instead of executing
> the whole function. This is necessary, because dummy devices are
> special, and shouldn't have the second part of the function executed.
>
> Otherwise reg_state, which is NETREG_DUMMY for dummy devices, will be
> overwritten and there will be no way to identify that this is a dummy
> device. Also, this device do not need the final put_device(), since
> dummy devices are not registered (through register_netdevice()), where
> the device reference is increased (at netdev_register_kobject() ->
> device_add()).
There's a small fuzz when applying due to the phy topo changes
landing, please rebase, the CI didn't ingest it right.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists