netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 00/15] eth: fbnic: Add network driver for Meta Platforms Host Network Interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKgT0Uf4i_MN-Wkvpk29YevwsgFrQ3TeQ5-ogLrF-QyMSjtiug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:07:02 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, 
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
	Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, 
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>, 
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 00/15] eth: fbnic: Add network driver for Meta
 Platforms Host Network Interface

On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 1:01 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 08:56:31AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 4:42 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> > >
> > > > What is less clear to me is what do we do about uAPI / core changes.
> > >
> > > I would differentiate between core change and core additions. If there
> > > is very limited firmware on this device, i assume Linux is managing
> > > the SFP cage, and to some extend the PCS. Extending the core to handle
> > > these at higher speeds than currently supported would be one such core
> > > addition. I've no problem with this. And i doubt it will be a single
> > > NIC using such additions for too long. It looks like ClearFog CX LX2
> > > could make use of such extensions as well, and there are probably
> > > other boards and devices, maybe the Zynq 7000?
> >
> > The driver on this device doesn't have full access over the PHY.
> > Basically we control everything from the PCS north, and the firmware
> > controls everything from the PMA south as the physical connection is
> > MUXed between 4 slices. So this means the firmware also controls all
> > the I2C and the QSFP and EEPROM. The main reason for this is that
> > those blocks are shared resources between the slices, as such the
> > firmware acts as the arbitrator for 4 slices and the BMC.
>
> Ah, shame. You took what is probably the least valuable intellectual
> property, and most shareable with the community and locked it up in
> firmware where nobody can use it.
>
> You should probably stop saying there is not much firmware with this
> device, and that Linux controls it. It clearly does not...
>
>         Andrew

Well I was referring more to the data path level more than the phy
configuration. I suspect different people have different levels of
expectations on what minimal firmware is. With this hardware we at
least don't need to use firmware commands to enable or disable queues,
get the device stats, or update a MAC address.

When it comes to multi-host NICs I am not sure there are going to be
any solutions that don't have some level of firmware due to the fact
that the cable is physically shared with multiple slots.

I am assuming we still want to do the PCS driver. So I will still see
what I can do to get that setup.

Thanks,

- Alex