lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:54:24 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>, Yunsheng Lin
 <linyunsheng@...wei.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, "Ilias
 Apalodimas" <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Christoph Lameter
 <cl@...ux.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com>,
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
 <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 7/9] libeth: add Rx buffer management

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:36:13 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Which tree this should go through? Should I include this patch to this
> series with libeth or it's better to push this through kees/linux and
> then pull to net-next?

I think doc tree is a strong candidate, or at least we should not
merge without consulting Jon. Please post and we'll figure it out.

The question someone may ask, however, is whether it causes new
warnings to appear?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ