netdev - Re: 14141

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:49:40 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
 <devel@...ux-ipsec.org>, Tobias Brunner <tobias@...ongswan.org>
Subject: Re: 14141

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 19:48:46 +0200 Antony Antony wrote:
> > Could you turn this into a selftest?  
> 
> I thought about it, and I didn't find any selftest file that match this
> test. This test need a topology with 4, ideally 5, namespaces connected in a line, and ip xfrm.
> 
> git/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh  is probably the easiest I
> can think off.
> 
> git/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net/xfrm_policy.sh seems to be a bit
> more complex to a extra tests to.
> 
> Do you have any preference? which file to add?

Whatever's easiest, I don't have much experience with either of those.
You can also create a new file, it's perfectly fine, just make sure
you add it to the makefile so kselftest knows about it