netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 12] gve: Correctly report software timestamping capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <661953c285139_38e2532941f@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 11:31:14 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: John Fraker <jfraker@...gle.com>, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: John Fraker <jfraker@...gle.com>, 
 Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>, 
 Shailend Chand <shailend@...gle.com>, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, 
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
 Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Junfeng Guo <junfeng.guo@...el.com>, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 12] gve: Correctly report software timestamping
 capabilities

John Fraker wrote:
> gve has supported software timestamp generation since its inception,
> but has not advertised that support via ethtool. This patch correctly
> advertises that support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Fraker <jfraker@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>

Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>

> ---
> v2: Used ethtool_op_get_ts_info instead of our own implementation, as
>     suggested by Jakub

FYI: the subject says "net-next 12", not "net-next v2"