netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 12] gve: Correctly report software timestamping capabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGH0z2Hp_tXb1dBUDDbWn8J4VG4E9COBkYdWT3HB2NAHB4tXVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 12:59:42 -0700
From: John Fraker <jfraker@...gle.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>, 
	Shailend Chand <shailend@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Junfeng Guo <junfeng.guo@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 12] gve: Correctly report software timestamping capabilities

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 8:31 AM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> John Fraker wrote:
> > gve has supported software timestamp generation since its inception,
> > but has not advertised that support via ethtool. This patch correctly
> > advertises that support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Fraker <jfraker@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Harshitha Ramamurthy <hramamurthy@...gle.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>

Thank you

> > ---
> > v2: Used ethtool_op_get_ts_info instead of our own implementation, as
> >     suggested by Jakub
>
> FYI: the subject says "net-next 12", not "net-next v2"
>
Sorry about that!

I made two rookie mistakes haha. Sending the patch late at night, and
not re-doing my test email after editing.